I don't believe the "safety nets" the federal gov't has setup are the answer.
In other words, you're opposed to Social Security, a primary safety net.
Who is to judge that certain groups of people have more than they'll ever need?
As Ronald Reagan would say, judge for yourself. Are you better off now than you were before?
Are you better off without a pension? And with no raises for several years?
if all "the rich" (even if it were the top 5%) gave every single dime they had to the U.S. Gov't, it would only be enough to run it and these programs for a very short time (mere months).
Let's return to the tax rates in place during the 1960s and see the results.
When we get back to the states embracing their rights and powers, where the heart of the representative republic form of gov't we were founded on lies, and away from too much overreach and control at the federal level, we'll all be better off.
The states and cities are broken. They have also cut taxes to the wealthy.
Posted by: sarah_oz@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (0) |
Belum ada komentar untuk "Re: [TSP_Strategy] Not Exactly Getting Rich"
Post a Comment