Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: 20% tariff on Mexican imports

 

With all due respect, your opinion is in the minority from the experts who like myself have more actual "field" experience with the security issues across multiple sectors of the sw border. Nobody is calling for a 2k mile long wall, strategic areas in order to control and redirect illegal traffic flows is the point as The "virtual wall" has done virtually nothing and arguably it has been that way by design. The narcotic impact alone would be substantial. It may be just one more security tool but a significant one at that.

Let's address the $$$ issue. Can someone explain to me how the cost of such a barrier at 10 billion is such a financial burden ? Obama was given a blank check of nearly 1 trillion at the start of his term for so-called "shovel ready" jobs. Trump is now going to be asking for a similar amount in the neighborhood of 1 trillion on "infrastructure". Given these numbers, the expense is literally a drop in the bucket.

As far as the reimbursement issue goes, agree the best target for that would be the 20+ billion a year in illegal wages earned in tbe US being sent south.

---

From: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of agent_bowen@yahoo.com [TSP_Strategy] <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 10:59:29 AM
To: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: 20% tariff on Mexican imports

 

 

So does your limited field experience make you an expert?  I disagree.

Yes "the Great Wall" is another tool but unnecessary for its dollar value.  This infrastructure could be replaced with a virtual wall and/or barrier that can detect seismic activity and vehicular incursions to say the least.  Due to this being a public forum I cannot expound on other capabilities this virtual wall entails.  Furthermore, it will allow for a better response time and allocation of resources every time detection warrants an arrest.  Unlike the physical wall, this can be installed along the 2k miles of border we share with Mexico in its entirety.

One alternative to the Great Wall is strategic placement.  Rather than build it entirely how about building a physical wall in advantageous locations?  This will cost taxpayers a fraction of the estimated 8 billion dollars.

In regards to the movement of illegal narcotics more difficult, you should know that the majority of narcotics trafficked are via air, sea, and below ground.  

Like yourself I have arrested thousands of illegal aliens throughout multiple presidential administrations.  Operation Gatekeeper merely redirected entries to other states, sectors, corridors, zones, hence...area of responsibilities.

Yes, I fully support President Trumps stance on immigration.  The Great Wall is not the most cost efficient tool to combat alien smuggling and human trafficking Americans seek.

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Matt G <Socalinsd@hotmail.com>

---

Reply via web post

•

Reply to sender

•

Reply to group

•

Start a New Topic

•

Messages in this topic (47)

---

Have you tried the highest rated email app?

With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

---

Neither the TSP Strategy group, nor individual members, are licensed or authorized to provide investment advice. Any statements made herein merely reflect the personal opinions of the individual group member. Please make your own investment decisions based upon your personal circumstances.

Visit Your Group

• New Members 13

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

Anda baru saja membaca artikel yang berkategori dengan judul Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: 20% tariff on Mexican imports. Anda bisa bookmark halaman ini dengan URL https://1stleadershipworkshop.blogspot.com/2017/01/re-tspstrategy-re-20-tariff-on-mexican_31.html. Terima kasih!

Ditulis oleh: Andriansyah -