If I got less than 3 years before retirement I wouldn't mess with all of it except for the safety of G. I got 2 years before retirement and I went from 100% S when this group first recommended it to 60 %G 40% S by instinct when china stock went down and glad I did. Waiting for Sarah to give orders to sell S and I would go 100% G.
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2015, at 11:35 AM, "sarah_oz@yahoo.com [TSP_Strategy]" <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Just my opinion, but why would you want to be in F? Pending rate hikes put the risk/reward ratio way too high. For the same reason L2020 appears to be way over-weighted in F and I. I wouldn't mess with either of them.
Exactly for that reason. Some believe that there will be no pending rate hikes due to a weakening economy, and in fact, may require added quantitative easing.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Nelson Garcia <it2garcia@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (24) |
Neither the TSP Strategy group, nor individual members, are licensed or authorized to provide investment advice. Any statements made herein merely reflect the personal opinions of the individual group member. Please make your own investment decisions based upon your personal circumstances.
.
__,_._,___
Anda baru saja membaca artikel yang berkategori dengan judul Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: TSP: Look But Don't Panic. Anda bisa bookmark halaman ini dengan URL https://1stleadershipworkshop.blogspot.com/2015/11/re-tspstrategy-re-tsp-look-but-dont_88.html. Terima kasih!
Ditulis oleh:
Andriansyah -
Belum ada komentar untuk "Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: TSP: Look But Don't Panic"
Post a Comment