Just my opinion, but why would you want to be in F? Pending rate hikes put the risk/reward ratio way too high. For the same reason L2020 appears to be way over-weighted in F and I. I wouldn't mess with either of them.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, JM Bud jmbud2@gmail.com [TSP_Strategy] <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanks, Linda. With under 3 year to retirement, I've been exploring a similar strategy - being more aggressive and agile with my payroll contribution allocation to capture market trends, and more conservative and stable with my account distribution to preserve wealth. Not enough time yet to see how well this strategy will perform.One small difference from your mix though. An adviser I spoke with suggested using the L2020 Fund instead of G for a modest allocation of new contributions. He said it's the closest thing that the TSP has to a Balanced Fund. Makes sense to me. So now only my account distribution has any percentage in G. New contributions are only in C, S, I, and L2020.I contacted Tammy Flanagan and one of her round table guests who mentioned this strategy in a recent Gov Exec article for more insight. No response yet.Jim.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Doug Peterson <dpatd10@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (22) |
Neither the TSP Strategy group, nor individual members, are licensed or authorized to provide investment advice. Any statements made herein merely reflect the personal opinions of the individual group member. Please make your own investment decisions based upon your personal circumstances.
.
__,_._,___
Anda baru saja membaca artikel yang berkategori dengan judul Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: TSP: Look But Don't Panic. Anda bisa bookmark halaman ini dengan URL https://1stleadershipworkshop.blogspot.com/2015/11/re-tspstrategy-re-tsp-look-but-dont.html. Terima kasih!
Ditulis oleh:
Andriansyah -
Belum ada komentar untuk "Re: [TSP_Strategy] Re: TSP: Look But Don't Panic"
Post a Comment