Dear All,
As per your response, since some of you did not recieve this article completely, so here it is again.
Sorry, if you recvd it twice.
Thanks
Rajesh Diwan
http://in.linkedin.com/pub/rajesh-
From: Rajesh Diwan <rxdiwan@gmail.
Date: Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Where our B-schools have gone wrong - Article
To:
Besides offering too few electives, the Indian B-schools are indulging in too much of teaching
According to a Chinese saying, "In pursuit of knowledge, everyday something is acquired and in pursuit of wisdom, everyday something is dropped." Our business schools do not seem to agree. To remain relevant in a fast changing world, our B-schools want to teach more so that their students acquire more and drop less. In the process, the students are facing the danger of becoming increasingly less wise.
Generally, an MBA curriculum aims at achieving the integration of diverse academic disciplines for creating managers capable of making ethical and commercially viable decisions in an interconnected world. Hence, the curriculum of a B-school focusses on diverse functional areas such as economics, operations and marketing, and also deals with interpersonal leadership and communication skills that are essential for managerial effectiveness. Considering the fact that the different streams which go into the management discipline have achieved a high level of sophistication and that many students often join MBA programmes from diverse background without any prior knowledge of those areas, the B-schools normally offer some core courses. These compulsory courses build the foundation for taking up specialised courses by students later as per their individual choice.
For providing more time for absorption and creative thinking and maximising the freedom of choice, good B-schools try to optimise the teaching load by offering a less number of compulsory courses and a large number of electives. For example, Wharton and Harvard offer only 10 core courses (at the the Sloan School of Management in MIT the number is only five) and a huge number of elective courses. Harvard offers about 100 electives while in Wharton the number reaches almost 200. In most cases, the students need to select about 10 courses from these electives. In a way, the number of electives defines the level of academic competition within a business school. Different courses have to compete with each other for survival. Students in many U.S. B-schools are even allowed to take a few courses from other schools or universities, thus raising the level of competition even higher.
A quick glance at the MBA curricula of Indian B-schools reveals that competition is relevant only for classroom discussions. The programmes in all schools are overloaded with a large number of compulsory courses. This is true not only of a run-of-the-mill B-school, but also of the Indian "Ivy League" — the IIMs. IIM-Lucknow teaches 24 core courses and offers only 15 electives; in IIM-Kozhikode the numbers are: 24 core and 48 electives. IIM-Calcutta teaches 25 core courses in the first year and offers about 80 electives. The leader, IIM-Ahmedabad, teaches 33 core courses (a total of 25.5 credits) and offers only about 80 electives against Harvard's (whose model it is supposedly following) 10 core vs. 100 electives.
Besides offering too few electives, the Indian B-schools are indulging in too much of teaching. For example, if about 20 courses are the norm in most of the top U.S. B-schools for a two-year MBA degree, IIM-Bangalore teaches 18 courses in the first year itself. In some B-schools the total number of courses goes almost up to 60! Obviously, with such a high teaching load our B-schools can nowhere come near their international counterparts in terms of quality teaching, research and breakthrough thinking. There is no time available for creative thinking and innovation. The large number of assignments and evaluation that go with every course is making our students only experts in cutting and pasting. Probably, only the AICTE is happy with the situation because of its total faith in quantitative criteria for providing accreditation. Compulsory teaching of too many subjects and mass proliferation of B-schools are forcing many of them to completely rely on visiting faculty. Such pure transaction-
For ensuring quality, our B-schools must drastically reduce the teaching load of compulsory courses. More electives must be offered to give a wider variety of choices to students and maintain pressure on instructors to keep their courseware marketable. This is critical in today's environment since the knowledge revolution is making courses obsolete very fast and, at the same time, creating scope for many exotic electives.
Excessive teaching is also adversely impacting the development of strategic focus areas. If Kellogg is known for marketing, Stanford for technology and Harvard for general management, then our B-schools are not known for any such focus. Out of the 10 core courses taught in the Harvard Business School in the first year five courses are: leadership and organisational behaviour, strategy, the entrepreneurial manager, leadership & corporate accountability and business, government & international economics (BGIE). Most of the electives offered in the school are also designed around these courses. It is no wonder why Harvard is known for its strength in general management. Many a time, institutes may teach similar core courses, but the large basket of elective courses offered from one area make their focus visible. By teaching everything to everyone and with a very less number of electives, Indian B-schools generally are not able to develop a high level of expertise in any single area.
Lack of focus also impacts the income generating capability of the institutes. It is believed that a two-third's of Harvard Business School's income comes from non-fee collections, namely from executive training and publishing. But for most of the Indian B-schools, fee collection is the sole source of revenue. The IIMs earn a good amount of revenue from executive training and consultancy though, it mainly comes from government and quasi-government organisations which have more to do with bureaucratic risk-hedging than actual competence.
Once the Foreign University Bill is passed, many global brands will come to India for capturing the existing market for reputed international MBA degree at affordable cost. In the emerging red ocean current, leaders may not face many problems for some more years because of their established brand image and infrastructure facilities. Other B-schools with good infrastructure can survive by offering their facilities to foreign institutions and thus converting themselves to real estate provider from education provider. And for the rest, the day of reckoning has come and it is time to migrate from MBA education to the next emerging field of education business.
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
------------
not copy, disclose or use its contents. If you have received it in error,
please inform us immediately by return E-Mail and delete the document.
sind, duerfen Sie den Inhalt weder kopieren, verbreiten oder benutzen.
Sollten Sie dieses E-Mail versehentlich erhalten haben, senden Sie es bitte
an uns zurueck und loeschen es anschliessend.
Esta mensagem, e qualquer de seus anexos, eh confidencial e privilegiada.
Caso voce nao seja o destinatario, nao esta autorizado a reproduzir ou
divulgar a terceiros o conteudo desta mensagem e de qualquer anexo da mesma
e deve apagar com os seus respectivos anexos.
------------
--
Rajesh Diwan
visit us at www.shabbarsuterwala.com
Belum ada komentar untuk "[LeadersWorkshop] Where our B-schools have gone wrong - Article"
Post a Comment