"I find it interesting that someone here mentioned yesterday that this group can “be classified as a long term trading group”, yet there are “attempts to time the market”. That makes no sense haha. You can’t say you’re doing “time in the market” and also “timing the market”."
Sure it make sense. Trading is selling one asset and buying another with the expectation that the newer asset will increase in value at a greater rate than the older asset. Here G was sold and S was bought with the expectation that S would increase at a greater rate. With any trading approach, from day trading to long term trading, there is always some "time in the market" be it brief or ever so long.
Furthermore trading depends more on technical analysis or chart analysis (Price, Volume, Rate of Change, Historic Patterns) than fundamental economic analysis. The decision to go to S was based on the expectation of the Santa Clause rally -- that's technical analysis. A decision based on fundamental analysis (used by by and hold investors IE Warren Buffett who says "buy and never sell") would perhaps have examined the PEG ratio of the underlying companies comprising the S. Didn't see and mention of that.
My comments are just to properly classify what is being done. Not to say one way is better than another. The only test is if you are making a good return with what you are doing. Sarah has a good track record doing what she is doing, but it is trading.
Groups.io Links:
Sure it make sense. Trading is selling one asset and buying another with the expectation that the newer asset will increase in value at a greater rate than the older asset. Here G was sold and S was bought with the expectation that S would increase at a greater rate. With any trading approach, from day trading to long term trading, there is always some "time in the market" be it brief or ever so long.
Furthermore trading depends more on technical analysis or chart analysis (Price, Volume, Rate of Change, Historic Patterns) than fundamental economic analysis. The decision to go to S was based on the expectation of the Santa Clause rally -- that's technical analysis. A decision based on fundamental analysis (used by by and hold investors IE Warren Buffett who says "buy and never sell") would perhaps have examined the PEG ratio of the underlying companies comprising the S. Didn't see and mention of that.
My comments are just to properly classify what is being done. Not to say one way is better than another. The only test is if you are making a good return with what you are doing. Sarah has a good track record doing what she is doing, but it is trading.
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2948) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [prefander.leadersworkshop@blogger.com]
_._,_._,_
Anda baru saja membaca artikel yang berkategori dengan judul Re: [TSPStrategy] Tsp and _not_ trading. Anda bisa bookmark halaman ini dengan URL https://1stleadershipworkshop.blogspot.com/2022/01/re-tspstrategy-tsp-and-not-trading_79.html. Terima kasih!
Ditulis oleh:
Andriansyah -
Belum ada komentar untuk "Re: [TSPStrategy] Tsp and _not_ trading"
Post a Comment