Disagree. The president (who, currently, is NO cinc) is responsible for making trade deals and signing treaties.
There is a school of thought that the 2008 burst of the housing bubble was caused by the Clinton's when they demanded that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loosen up its lending policies to allow "the American Dream" to more people, regardless of credit risk, ability to pay, etc.
Regarding jobs, I think it was Reagan who extended "most favored nation" trading status to China. That's fine, except for the trade deals that followed (NAFTA) started the snowball of trade deficits. Next you have companies that can no longer compete by manufacturing here, so those jobs go overseas. So the guy making twenty dollars an hour pushing a broom, is suddenly left with nowhere to go but McDonald's. And when he can't hold on to his house AND his toys on seven fifty an hour he jumps on the democratic and liberal media bandwagon and starts screaming about wage disparity.
My two cents.
From: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 11:49 PM
To: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSP_Strategy] Election time.
our economic condition is bigger than any sitting President can change. Please America! Quit putting everything on the CINC. He is not God. The economy is the gorilla in the closet. It will do what it will do regardless of a Republican or Democrat sitting in the Oval office. The biggest issue as I see it though, is this austerity of the middle class that we are living in. The rich have been making the biggest gains of history in this while our wages have stagnated for way too long. And as such, I tend to agree with Democrat tactics of increasing their taxes again, just like the old days. If you want to blame a President for our economic woes, then blame Ronald Reagan.
From: "Matt G socalinsd@hotmail.com [TSP_Strategy]" <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com>
To: "TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com" <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TSP_Strategy] Election time.
Agreed, are we still 100% F here? 8-)
From: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of robert winfield winfield100@yahoo.com [TSP_Strategy] <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:46 PM
To: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com; TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSP_Strategy] Election time.
Moderator!!!
Where is the hammer of God?!
TSP only please
Classic tactic to try and change the argument.
We are taking about economic growth and the proven lack thereof for the past 8 years. My statistics speak for themselves. If you think the current track we are are on is a successful one; well 70% of Americans think differently.
From: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of orsadude2@yahoo.com [TSP_Strategy] <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 6:23 PM
To: TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSP_Strategy] Election time.
Hmmm, really? So we can only blame Bush "at best for part of 2008-2009"? So, President Clinton left office in 2001 with a budget surplus...yet after 8 years 2001 to 2009, not only has the country gone into a war, where no evidence of WMD was ever presented, a financial collapse and a car industry that was about to implode. So his 8 years produced a better outcome, then these past 8 years...that is what I'm to take from your comment? Incredible...
Posted by: <Daryl.L.Bentley@faa.gov>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
Belum ada komentar untuk "RE: [TSP_Strategy] Election time."
Post a Comment