You might want to revise to 2025. IMHO, 2050 is a bit of a stretch.
Posted by: sarah_oz@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
Soft Skills Development & Training
You might want to revise to 2025. IMHO, 2050 is a bit of a stretch.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
I have been watching oil stabilize in the low 30s and see this as positive. Stocks are still swinging with oil prices but as long as oil can remain somewhat stable there may be gains here. This week I switched from predominately G to now 70% C and 30% S. Looking for further moves in S&P to 2050. Will likely go 100% G at that point. Cheers - Eric
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Thursday, March 3, 2016, 7:54 AM, sarah_oz@yahoo.com [TSP_Strategy] <TSP_Strategy@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
FWIW, to date, the rebound appears to be a normal bull phase of a longer term bear market.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic () |
FWIW, to date, the rebound appears to be a normal bull phase of a longer term bear market.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (11) |
Yes - lots of flexing! lol - thanks Sarah as always!
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (10) |
Flexing your fingers?
Unfortunately, these levels are not "cut and dried." We need to consider the formations, as well.
At this point, I'm still watching and waiting.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
Looks like we should start preparing ourselves for this level soon? Another great day.
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
By Amelia Gruber
4:46 PM ET
February was slightly better than January for the funds in the federal employee Thrift Savings Plan, but it still was not a great month for retirement investments.
International investments in the I Fund and common stocks in the C Fund again ended the month in the red. The I Fund was down the most for February, losing 2.82 percent. The C Fund slipped 0.12 percent for the month. Both funds were well in the red for the year-to-date, as well. International stocks fell 8.28 percent for the year, while common stocks lost 5.07 percent.
The small and midsize companies in the S Fund were down almost as much as international stocks for the year-to-date, with losses of 8.26 percent. But the S Fund performed better for the month of February, with gains of 0.5 percent.
The usually-steady government securities (G) and fixed income bond (F) funds also had small gains in February. The G Fund was up 0.15 percent for the month and 0.34 percent for the year to date. The F Fund grew 0.68 percent for the month and 2.18 percent for the year so far.
TSP's lifecycle offerings – which move investors to more conservative portfolios as they near retirement – were all slightly in the red for February, with the exception of the L Income fund for people who have started making withdrawals. L Income was up 0.01 percent last month. The L 2020 fund was down 0.24 percent; L 2030, 0.41 percent; L 2040, 0.51 percent; and L 2050, 0.63 percent.
The lifecycle funds all lost ground for the year to date as well. L Income fell 0.90 percent; L 2020, 2.79 percent; L 2030, 3.97 percent; L 2040, 4.70 percent; and L 2050, 5.46 percent.
(Image via kuruneko / Shutterstock.com)
By Amelia Gruber
4:46 PM ET
TSP Funds Show Slight Signs of Improvement in February
| TSP Funds Show Slight Signs of Improvement in February Still, many ended the month in the red or with very small gains. | |||||
| Preview by Yahoo | |||||
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |